 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
04-20-2013, 09:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
sarcasim
i took the whole thread to be sarcasim and humorous.
people have opinions that they feel trump logic and fact or fail to look at that as the first explanation to something, before giving an opinion. you can see how silly the debate really is now right? this question would never have been posed if something thought about it before posing the debate. i propose the debate should not exist. the arguments should be closed and the thread deleted now that we alll know what rare means. LOL. kevin 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rarity of Shonen/Youth's Companion Ruth cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-04-2008 10:24 PM |
| Is anyone setting up at the National. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-24-2007 05:57 PM |
| Grading cards--setting the value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-04-2007 02:34 PM |
| The commonness of rare cards is less perplexing than the rarity of common ones | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-15-2006 07:08 PM |
| condition rarity in e cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-02-2005 11:24 PM |
Threaded Mode