 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
03-22-2013, 10:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Namath
Nice looking Namath! The miscut/oc will kill the grade...assuming it's not trimmed. IMO, you should definitely go with PSA and let them put the qualifier on it. Reason being is if it does indeed grade a 7 or 6(oc), it will look better in a high grade holder. If you don't get a qualifier, good luck getting it in a holder any higher than a 4.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1965 Topps Joe Namath RC #122 (Low-Mid Grade) | freakhappy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-03-2011 11:28 PM |
| 1965 " Namath" Card | Ben Yourg | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-16-2009 08:59 PM |
| New postal rate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-18-2007 03:18 PM |
| Is this the going rate for an E90-1 Jackson? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-19-2005 02:59 PM |
| How does this rate... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2002 07:18 PM |
Threaded Mode