![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: IS this Grading Company trying to deceive to look like PSA on their flip? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 64.41% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 32.20% |
I don't know. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 3.39% |
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see anything to indicate an attempt to deceive. The holder is clearly marked CSA and the description states the grader is CSA. If you've been in the hobby long enough, you are familiar with the old CSA grading company.
John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should I cross-over BVG to SGC flip? | HOF Auto Rookies | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-22-2012 12:25 PM |
Unusual PSA flip | 4815162342 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 12-09-2010 10:39 PM |
PSA flip opinion......... | tjb1952tjb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-05-2009 06:29 AM |
O/T Fakes that do not Deceive | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-23-2007 09:49 PM |
To flip or not to flip? That is the question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 07-20-2007 01:38 PM |