 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
12-30-2012, 07:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
very poor
I think we need qualifiers below sgc 10 poor these days, as sgc 10 cards are what I used to call g+.
We could have poor, near poor, very poor, awful etc. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Auction Description | Sterling Sports Auctions | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-06-2010 07:48 PM |
| T205 Short Print List - Is T205.org's Correct? | T206.org | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-03-2009 09:23 AM |
| Description is the best | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-01-2009 08:51 PM |
| Great description. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-08-2005 04:31 AM |
| Some description.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-26-2003 03:05 PM |
Threaded Mode