|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How I feel about these modern Helmar creations- | |||
| I like them. |
|
121 | 58.17% |
| I don't like them. |
|
52 | 25.00% |
| I don't care. |
|
35 | 16.83% |
| Voters: 208. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just my inexperienced and very humble opinion here...the Helmar version lacks something which appeared on the original and should be fairly easy to spot...unless I am much mistaken. No confusing their version with the Goudey Lajoie.
![]() (I do not work for Helmar, know anyone from Helmar, own stock in the company, plan to enter into any position regarding equitable securities offered by the company, if any, within the next 72 hours, etc., etc., etc.) Oh, additionally, the card pictured is (clearly) not mine. Best, Eric
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (136/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (198/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't know if you were around for the huge fuss I created when I tried to create a set of Old Judge reprints. Even having them larger with stamps on the back AND an added identifying mark on the front, was not enough for some board members. This Lajoie is damned close to the original, the same size, AND distressed.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Scott check out the post above by tonyo, the Lajoie isn't the same size as the original
__________________
Please check out my books on baseball history. They include the bio of star second baseman Dots Miller. A book featuring 20 Moonlight Graham players who got into just one game. Another with 13 players who were with the Pittsburgh Pirates during the regular season, but never played a game. There's also one about 27 baseball families, as well as a day-by-day look at the worst team in Pittsburgh Pirates history. All five can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/stores/John-D...hor/B0DH87Q2DS |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So....carry on.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-28-2012 at 01:12 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I voted yes, I like them, because I do think they are nice artwork. However, like alot of others, I'd rather put larger money into cards that were actually made in the period they depict. I do have some reprint sets (52 topps, t206, CJ, T3, goodwin) but I paid less for all of those than the Lajoie finished last night.
Regardless, since I do like the cards, I thought the helmar Lajoie would be a nice replacement for a card I will never own as opposed to your run-of-the-mill reprint. (despite the missing lines in the background - thanks Eric, I didn't notice that, and a different # on the back) I wouldn't have won it anyway since I had decided to bid $50 max and it ended at $56......... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
The premise that these cards, in some cases, command high premiums is due to their alleged scarcity. I have not collected any of these cards, so my question would be how hard would these cards be to duplicated by someone other than the original producer, in effect reducing their scarcity and diluting the value, and offering the reproductions in a secondary market or even ebay?
Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 01-03-2013 at 09:27 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|