![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1 out of 18
As far as Jim having a high percentage, not too strange. I bought a large collection of Sweet Caps and a very high percentage of them were 649 OP's - it just depends on where the collection came from and when they were picked up.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mine is
198 total T206 Sc 150 25 3 SC 150 30 5 SC 150 OP 2 SC 350 25 5 SC 350 30 34 SC 350-460 25 5 SC 350-460 30 4 SC 350-460 42 2 SC 350-460 42op 2 When I started I bought in an odd pattern for the time. I'd buy the less common backs over SC or piedmont. But I didn't pay much attention to the factory. And I still don't pay much attention to the factory aside from picking up the couple 150OP backs since I hadn't bought any till about a year ago. Steve B |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Kevin,
Interesting question but I don't think the numbers are too shocking when we start analyzing by factory numbers. At that point there are 39 different backs so if one of them constitutes 2-3% that is more or less to be expected. Among Sweet Cap backs it may be on the tougher side. I actually think the Sweet Cap 350-460 factory 42 no overstrike is the toughest Sweet Cap back, at least from my experience. When I started paying attention to factory numbers for my back run, I had ZERO examples of this back out of 600 T206s in my collection. JimB ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
3/519.... SC 350-460 42's in my collection The "expected" distribution from my simple tabulation is: sc150 25; 7-8 (15) sc150 30 ; 25 (25) sc350 25 ; 11-16 (8) sc350 30 ; 61-65 (50) sc350-460 30; 9-10 (9) sc350-460 42; 3 (3) sc150 649 op; 6-9 (3) sc350-460 25; 2-3 (2) sc350-460 42 op; 6-10 (6) number in parenthesis is the number of each back I have in my 519 collection |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting observation JimB, about the SC 350-460 Factory 42 No Overprint.
Of my 21 SC backed cards, this is the only SC350/460 F42 No OP I have: |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of the 300 cards I've actually scanned, I found a few Sweet Cap 350-460 factory 42 no overstrike examples:
![]() ![]() and one with a 'wet sheet transfer': ![]() While looking at my site, I only found one of these: ![]()
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went through my cards today and found 8 out of 460 with a SC 150 Factory 25 back and 2 cards with a SC 350-460 Factory 42 back. In all, there is about 110 cards with Sweet Caporal backs in my set, as I haven't updated my back list in a few months.
__________________
Looking for Fan Craze and Zeenut Orval Overall cards and a T200 Chicago Cubs card. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went back thru my cards, and i only have 4 with the scap 350-460 factory 42 back (do we now think this is actually scarcer than the 350-460 factory 25 back?). That might make for another thread. I think there is no mistaking that these are rarer versions that the 150 series card. I just think that maybe this back is a little more scarce than thought of.
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 09-15-2012 at 05:40 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
J@son/T206blogcom
Your Duffy has a wet sheet transfer also. Look above his bat or in the lower left corner (in the grass) with a loupe. ![]() Jantz |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wee Willie Keeler T206 Sweet Cap (w/Bat) PSA 4.5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-22-2009 06:44 PM |
WTB T206 Hal Chase (Dark Cap) Sweet Cap VG-VGEX | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-04-2009 07:20 PM |
WTB T206 Sweet Cap 150 overprint HOFer SGC 40-50 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-02-2009 07:19 AM |
T206 Sweet Cap Back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-16-2007 08:29 PM |
Do Sweet Cap Factory 42 T206 cards... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-02-2002 12:00 PM |