 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-17-2012, 11:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Back when I cared more about the number on the flip than I do now, I always found it a bit odd that there wasn't an 82 / 6.5. Given that they had a 1.5 (SGC 20) and some half grades on the upper end, it makes sense that they'd add the ones in the lower-mid range. I can only think about Scott's beautiful T206 Wagner when hearing about this news. I'd imagine that card is due for a bump. 
|
|
#2
07-17-2012, 12:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree completely with Peter. The only way this has any integrity is if there is a risk/reward system built in. That way SGC is able to correct any mistakes they may have made in the past (it happens) and the submitter fully understands the risks going in. If it's only a one-way street then it's nothing more than a handout.
I've always rated SGC head and shoulders the best grading company, and I hope they do this the right way.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1960 Topps SGC - all graded 84 or higher | Irwin Fletcher | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-07-2012 08:14 PM |
| SGC grading question | h2oya311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-19-2011 07:57 AM |
| The Oaks Show and SGC Grading | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 83 | 11-25-2011 05:00 PM |
| SGC Grading Question | magic1313 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 04-01-2010 07:12 AM |
| Please explain sgc grading | Merrillstoys | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-21-2010 03:29 PM |
Hybrid Mode
