PSA vs SGC...the definitive Debate!!!

[glynparson]

looks like an 84 to me. maybe an 86.

Originally Posted by glynparson

looks like an 84 to me. maybe an 86.

+1 and to add it sounds as though you sent them to SGC because you trusted that they would grade the cards accuratly, which they did using their grading scale, but are pissed they don't grade like PSA where they have a grading scale but is rarely used properly, if at all.

[bobbyw8469]

I sent to SGC because I thought they knew the issue and had a special going on. Apparently they were unfamiliar with the issue, because when you grade cards that look brand new as '4's, then something is wrong with that picture. PSA grading the same card as an '8' affirms that one of the two doesn't really know what they are doing. That is too wide of a swing. Me being a consumer, I tend to side with the company grading the card an '8'. If a vending card comes back a '4', there better be a surface wrinkle, white on all 4 corners, SOMETHING. Not an excuse like microscopic surface cracking that can only be seen under extreme magnificaton.