 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who sucks the least? PSA or SGC? | |||
| PSA sucks the least! |
   
|
42 | 17.43% |
| SGC sucks the least! |
  
|
146 | 60.58% |
| They both suck equally! |
  
|
53 | 21.99% |
| Voters: 241. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
06-26-2012, 07:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Psa-sgc
I have to go with PSA. In my opinion there grading is much more consistent.
I think they grade differently. SGC seem to grade their cards 1/2 to 1 grade higher than PSA. I have seen many SGC 60 that would be a PSA 4 and SGC 50 that would be a PSA 3 OR 3 1/2. That is why some people prefer SGC because their grades come back higher. A lot of people also buy grade PSA with Qualifiers and crack them and send to SCG and get a nice grade with no qualifier. They both make some mistakes but who doesnt. We all like to think that are cards should grade higher regardless of which company grades them and whoever does not give us the grade we think that we deserve sucks more . I prefer PSA. John P 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1948 Leaf Football Master Set for Sale (#1 on PSA Set Registry) | OTWCards | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 06-23-2012 08:01 PM |
| PSA & SGC Diamond Stars for sale | heisman95 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-15-2010 04:51 PM |
| For sale Or Trade...Tons of High Grade Vintage Baseball...Many New Items | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-06-2010 10:31 AM |
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 10:05 AM |
| Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 05:51 PM |
Threaded Mode