![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Is erasing a pencil mark altering a card in a negative manner? | |||
yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 13.37% |
no |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
162 | 86.63% |
Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whoever made the mark altered the card. One can't undo trimming, coloring, etc (don't think so anyway). Altering an alteration? My vote: no, erase it.
I have a Ruth that was graded PSA authentic and was relieved when I found out it was only due to an erased mark. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting thread.
Most surprising: that it is more or less acceptable to erase. I'd done it when I was newer to the hobby, years ago, with some low-grade T206's. I did it not to deceive but to improve the appearance of the cards, with good results. But thinking more about it and concerned with the ethics, I stopped. Reading this thread, I was surprised to learn that SGC and most responders condoned it. After some more circumspection, I cracked open a PSA 1 [Mk] Frank Baker I'd recently bought, erased the light pencil mark on the back, and was very pleased to have improved the card. I can't see any erasure with the naked eye, nor is it noticeable under the microscope. I would disclose it were I to sell/trade it. But it brings up the question: What's the best eraser to use? I've used an ordinary draftsman's eraser [the white, plastic type, say the size of a 2" long, half inch thick bar]--certainly not the standard, orange pencil eraser, which could well leave color or damage the carboard fiber--But does anyone have any better suggestions? I do remember when I was a draftsman, many, many years ago, there was a gummy/putty-consistency eraser that might even be better. Thanks. Doug |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mars eraser is the best to use. It extracts the pencil off the card without the eraser making any type of mark on the card.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Pete.
I believe that's what I've been using [see scan]. The Staedtler/Mars-Plastic is a relic from my draftsman days, 47 years ago, and still works fine. I think the Entre is the same type, and it seems to work as well. But I seem to remember that in my shop there were putty-like, maybe art erasers, that some claimed to be superior. Anyway, this thread has impelled me to flip through my collection, and I see that I have at least a half dozen to clean up, which I now look forward to doing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If u owned a collectible car with original paint and a bird shit on the hood would u clean it off?? Is that altering the original finish?? Same diff...
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Those kneaded rubber erasers were designed to 'dab' at paper, and they do work really good. I've never used one on a card, but if I wanted to erase something I'd definitely try that first. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
Erasing Pencil Marks | Gecklund311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-07-2009 02:53 PM |
question on erasing pencil marks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 08-21-2008 06:09 PM |
Ruth with light pencil markings | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-29-2008 11:59 AM |
Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |