 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is erasing a pencil mark altering a card in a negative manner? | |||
| yes |
   
|
25 | 13.37% |
| no |
  
|
162 | 86.63% |
| Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#23
06-05-2012, 09:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I voted that erasing the light pencil mark is an alteration. The reason is that I think it's too fine a line to where people are saying that as long as the erasure isn't noticeable under 10x loupe, it's fine. Then what if it were a pen mark that a paper conservator removed where the removal also wasn't noticeable? What if someone were trimming a T206 Wagner or Plank where the trim job wasn't noticeable? If the owner of the card doesn't like the mark on it, sure, he can remove it, but then the card should be advertised as having the mark removed, and let the buyer judge whether that makes a difference in the price he would pay for it.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
| Erasing Pencil Marks | Gecklund311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-07-2009 02:53 PM |
| question on erasing pencil marks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 08-21-2008 06:09 PM |
| Ruth with light pencil markings | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-29-2008 11:59 AM |
| Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |
Threaded Mode