![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Is erasing a pencil mark altering a card in a negative manner? | |||
yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 13.37% |
no |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
162 | 86.63% |
Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Barry....Of course not, if it was my cobb I probably would have dashed to the sink and showered that sauce off. I am saying that the original sauce was what altered the card (like the original pencil mark) diminishing that sauce is like erasing the pencil mark (probably with much less sucessful results). Come to think of it, isn't it strange that restoration in comic books and in classic cars is considered ok yet in coins and stamps it is not ok. To me altering a card is not ok. And altering one and getting it bumped up by a tpg is dispicable. (sp?) Aloha Dave.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
Erasing Pencil Marks | Gecklund311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-07-2009 02:53 PM |
question on erasing pencil marks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 08-21-2008 06:09 PM |
Ruth with light pencil markings | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-29-2008 11:59 AM |
Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |