 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should E98 Old Put be classified as caramel or tobacco? | |||
| caramel |
   
|
30 | 71.43% |
| tobacco |
  
|
12 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
06-03-2012, 10:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
First off...this is my 5000th post!
 That out of the way, the residue left by a light erasure is too small for me to be concerned that the card is altered. technically speaking, if you hold a card between your fingers the natural you're probably adding an infinitesimal layer of oil to it, thus altering it. But no one would actually consider that an alteration. Likewise, a pencil erasure is a virtually undetactable change to the surface. And if nobody sees it, including TPG, then I don't really care. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| American Caramel E121 series of 80 survey revisited | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 01-11-2012 03:46 PM |
| Caramel cards...whats the deal with all the writing on them?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-07-2007 09:51 PM |
| SOLD 1910 E75 American Caramel - Near Set 16/20 | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-29-2007 10:07 PM |
| E96 Philadelphia Caramel Connie Mack "Signed" FT | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 08-31-2006 08:31 AM |
Threaded Mode