 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#28
05-25-2012, 07:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Taken by itself I don't see any problem with not disclosing that the card came back altered from PSA. The grade/determination assigned by PSA is their opinion. It is not fact. We have all heard of cases where PSA has deemed a card trimmed but upon resubmitting it has been graded numerically. Should a seller have to disclose if a card is resubmitted and receives a higher grade the 2nd time? The description indicates something is not right with the bottom border, so the buyer is aware. Furthermore, the seller also provides a 14 day return policy giving recourse if the buyer is not satisfied.
What does bother me though is looking at this card combined with the sellers overall feedback. Feedback percentage is 96.7% positive and most of the negative comments seem to be related to items not sent. To me that is concerning. dj 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1965 & 66 Philadelphia Football Card Backs | CowboysGuide | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 01-07-2010 05:08 PM |
| Bad card sold by 4_sharp_corners | HBroll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-18-2009 04:28 PM |
| Best HOF Rookie Card; worksheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-24-2008 02:34 AM |
| Graded Card Moral and Ethical Issue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 09-25-2006 09:07 PM |
| Why can't an altered card be graded? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 10-17-2005 10:28 PM |
Threaded Mode