 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21
01-06-2012, 08:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I've always liked woodcuts but I think the idea of cutting up the full page woodcuts to make smaller woodcuts is aweful. I can almost understand removing them from a publication but to me I feel the value of the woodcut would be in the native form from which it was found. It would be interesting to read the articles from that period in time. IMHO, encapsulating them for some reason or other just seems silly to me. Perhaps that makes me some kind of hypocrite because I see nothing wrong with cards being encapsulated. Please, by all means continue posting the full page woodcuts, those are just so cool.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paper Loss at Tips of Corners | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-22-2011 03:18 PM |
| WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
| border chipping vs paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-06-2008 02:40 PM |
| 1941 Play Ball - paper variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-25-2007 05:46 PM |
| fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
Threaded Mode