 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
11-28-2011, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe those other T206's are whatever....however, the cards I have shown here were all glued in an album for 80+ years when I acquired them.
Therefore, they were not "soaked", or subject to "fading", or affected by "chemicals". They are simply....printing flaws. I have quite a few more cards from various other sets that have similar printing flaws (i.e., missing an ink pass in the multi-color printing process). TED Z 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question on authenticity of T206 Mathewson which leads to a rookie grading dilemma... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-10-2007 07:37 AM |
| T206 "350-460" Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2007 04:45 PM |
| T206 Howie Camnitz PSA 10 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-11-2005 07:39 PM |
| T206 Beckley sale question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-04-2004 04:42 PM |
| T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 12:21 PM |
Threaded Mode