 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
10-08-2011, 10:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Jim- what I find interesting here is ACA did much more than merely render a verdict of genuine or not genuine. They took the bold step of calling it an unreleased proof. And that was the point of my sarcastic post #29: exactly what research went into this rather unique designation? There is nothing that any advanced collector on this board sees that would support their claim, so I would assume anyone making it would be prepared to defend such a determination. This of course doesn't answer your question about their liability, just my own thoughts on the matter.
Last edited by barrysloate; 10-08-2011 at 11:09 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recent passing of a relative of Honus Wagner! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-14-2011 10:43 PM |
| another wagner going on the block | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 06:21 PM |
| Wagner HBO Real Sports...what do you think? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 08-24-2006 12:05 PM |
| meant to follow up on the Wagner thread-- Context | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-06-2005 06:37 PM |
| Cobb vs. Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 90 | 07-03-2005 10:50 AM |
Threaded Mode