![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm bias, so I'll let someone answer. However, even w/o the ink or paper loss, it still should not have graded a 5. From their own website a PSA 5 "must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back." That is definitely not 90/10 centering on the back. I'll ge generous and call it 97/3
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need some help with PSA grading question! | npa589 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-22-2011 08:27 PM |
SGC Crossover question from a Rookie | joebrandon1977 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-09-2011 04:48 AM |
PSA to SGC crossover question | Section103 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2011 07:50 PM |
Oliver Optics Magazine question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 02-17-2008 12:17 PM |
Question about this Christy Mathewson item (scanned) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-20-2002 06:33 PM |