 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should we have one thread for ALL questionable items? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
41 | 51.25% |
| No |
  
|
24 | 30.00% |
| Don't care one way or the other |
  
|
15 | 18.75% |
| Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
03-21-2011, 06:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I voted no.
While it would make sorting out and maybe ignoring posts about fake stuff easy, I don't think it's truly better. Each sort of item and sometimes each fake is its own circumstance with its own set of useful information. Consider just what's current right now. A piece of silver/plate recently engraved A fake WS ring A questionable autograph And probably others. Posting about each of those things gets slightly confusing, imagine the postings about all 3 jammed into one thread. Personally I might skim one thread out of disinterest, but read another in detail. If I had to figure out which post was about which item I might not read any of it. And I wouldn't learn anything. Steve B 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mastro Auctions Mastro's Stuff? | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 113 | 09-11-2010 08:58 PM |
| Dealer questions containment thread | sago | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-18-2010 06:45 PM |
| Heritage Weekly Auctions | petecld | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-08-2010 02:59 PM |
| I will not participate in Legendary Auctions | bijoem | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 08-07-2009 08:29 AM |
| The best thread ever- T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-04-2006 01:57 AM |
Threaded Mode