![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I try and try to wrap my head around grading but sometimes and every time I think I have it figured out they change the game.
The concept of grading I thought was to bring a set of standards if you will to grading and acceptable practices in our hobby done by businesses and collectors. But where does the line get drawn on what is acceptable and what is not and why are there still such variances in what is sold to us a global set of standards? Which brings me to this lot here below, this card listed here was sold last year in REA. Now the card is being re-listed in its new PSA holder bumped up half a grade. All normal sometimes you can get a bump on a re-submission. But should you get that bump after chemically cleaning a card? The stains present on the above example are way more than a simple dry erase and distilled water soak IMO. If I am correct in my assumption then why would this card still retain its numerical grade? ![]() http://www.paragonauctionsite.com/Lo...=50&category=1 Love to hear your thoughts on this I know there have been many debates on cleaning, pressing (spooning) cards etc. but to me this is example is well above. Seems to me at this point this card has been altered from its original state, and thus should be AUTH anytime you enhance a cards features through manipulation of any kind at that point the card is altered and should simply get an AUTH grade. But hey that’s just my two cents share yours. Two quote Steven Wright.“If it's a penny for your thoughts and you put in your two cents worth, then someone, somewhere is making a penny.” Cheers, John Last edited by wonkaticket; 02-03-2011 at 09:18 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My T206 Plank theory....New Follow-up info | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 12-18-2020 12:14 PM |
REA reveals a 24 year mystery....the PIEDMONT Plank | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 141 | 05-17-2009 08:26 PM |
Was Plank the 36th card in the Sweet Cap 150 Fac 649 set ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 01-24-2009 08:11 PM |
1843 Very Early American Baseball/Cricket & Sports Sheet Music | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 06-10-2008 06:16 AM |
Spring Cleaning | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 10-28-2005 12:58 PM |