 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
01-28-2011, 11:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Ted - The reason for focusing on that single statement is that it goes to the heart of my argument for not including T213-1's as a T206. I felt it needed to be clarified.
If the T213-1's were comprised of just 350 Only subjects I would probably be on the side of their inclusion as T206's. But the combination of 150-350 subjects along with 350 Only subjects in the same print run is contradictory to how any back brand was printed in the whole of the T206 set. This is in no way a definitive answer to this question that will probably be debated for many years to come. But it's the one point I can not personally get past when it comes to the T213-1 and T215-1 sets being considered as T206's. Last edited by Abravefan11; 01-28-2011 at 11:06 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First Time Submission | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-06-2009 12:28 PM |
| O/T - best all time | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 01-06-2009 08:24 PM |
| *** Time to fire up the Network 54 Cabal again....d311s this time *** | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 12-01-2008 12:55 PM |
| My first time at the National | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-29-2008 03:15 PM |
| OT but it is time for the 134th Kentucky Derby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 100 | 05-17-2008 06:45 PM |
Threaded Mode