 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
12-22-2010, 11:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Another thing I didnt point out is the back has a subtle age discolor all the way around it, thats a good sign.
I went and read more in past posts, the common reprint have a glossy surface on front and a pure white back along with the "W-517" in bottom left corner. FWIW, If I saw that Ruth on eBay with that scan I wouldnt think twice about buying it, Id buy it right away without looking further. No red flags to me. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Real or Fake T206 Broad Leaf 460??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-02-2007 11:28 PM |
| 1936 R311 GLOSSY - Real or Fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-24-2006 01:53 PM |
| 33 Goudey Ruth Real or fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-13-2005 08:02 AM |
| Cobb - Real or Fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-17-2004 12:03 PM |
| Need help identifying this 1916 issue. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-22-2002 10:42 AM |
Threaded Mode