![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When we have these discussions there seems to be some confusion regarding exactly what a variation is. As Matt stated, there needs to be a change in the printing plate for it to be considered a true variation. The correction of "Magie", and of "Doyle, N.Y. Nat'l" are real variations. The printer caught his mistake early in the print run and made the necessary correction.
However, cards such as "Nodgrass", "Murr'y", and "Shappe" are not variations, but mere printing glitches. At some point in the print run a tiny foreign substance, perhaps a smudge of dirt or grease, got lodged in the printing plate and blocked some of the ink from adhering to the paper. That is not a true variation, although the hobby currently considers them so. Collectors pay huge premiums for these, but the jury is still out for me whether those premiums are merited. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1912 Honest Cut Ty Cobb Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-11-2009 06:07 PM |
How many people accept the T200 Cleveland card as their J. Jax card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-25-2007 11:04 AM |
Can An Off-Register Card or a Card With a Printer's Flaw Be Considered NrMt.? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-23-2007 10:46 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |