 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
05-19-2010, 06:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Sgc
Brian`s well thought out and thorough post is exactly why many of us use SGC exclusively....A couple of years ago I sent a number of cards for cross over and because the graders were not sure about a large percentage crossing over I received a call from Bryan to ask me wether I might accept possible downgrades...He did this I believe to save me my time and money...They could have just sent them back marked didn`t make minimum grade........Frankly since then I look at PSA cards very carefully......
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossovers to PSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 01-17-2009 05:38 PM |
| I found this strange/odd about SGC's registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-19-2008 06:13 PM |
| B/T PSA D322'S FOR COMPARABLE SGC'S D322'S | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 03-25-2008 03:57 PM |
| SGC's official response to '52 Mantle debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 02-10-2008 07:43 AM |
| SGC's New Message Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-14-2002 09:48 AM |
Threaded Mode