 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
05-19-2010, 02:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
In general, I like SGC grading and have had only one situation Where I was unhappy with the service. I had a Koester's bread Elmer Miller that I cracked out of a PSA slab for submission. The card came back labled as a W575-1. Looking in hindsight, should have submitted it while still in the PSA slab. The grade this card should have received was not the issue, it was the classification. Not happy with the result and the explanation from SGC was borderline at best. With all that said, My collection is all in SGC holders and will continue to be in SGC holders.
Kmac 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossovers to PSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 01-17-2009 04:38 PM |
| I found this strange/odd about SGC's registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-19-2008 05:13 PM |
| B/T PSA D322'S FOR COMPARABLE SGC'S D322'S | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 03-25-2008 02:57 PM |
| SGC's official response to '52 Mantle debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 02-10-2008 06:43 AM |
| SGC's New Message Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-14-2002 08:48 AM |
Threaded Mode