 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
05-18-2010, 04:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
It's unclear to me that the cards were penalized because they were submitted in PSA holders. I don't know what effect, if any, that has on the graders. What troubles me most about this, and about grading in general, is that after you complained about the grades, SGC asked you to send half of them back for a review. Why do they have to go through this procedure all over again? Why not get them all right the first time? If grading really is so subjective then what's the point?
Crossing over cards for a regrade is like walking through a minefield. I'm sorry this happened to you, but my opinion is when you buy a card in say a PSA 5 holder, that is what it is at that point in time. Once you send it for a regrade or a crossover, all bets are off. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| selling off my 1941 playball dupes all sgc | where the gold at? | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 03-13-2010 02:05 AM |
| SGC T205s (mostly 10s, 20s) for Sale | obcbobd | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 02-26-2010 08:18 AM |
| FS:17 T-206, T210 Weems, W514 Gandil all SGC Graded | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-19-2007 09:31 AM |
| 1962 Topps Football HIGH GRADE SGC Graded and Proof's | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 8 | 07-27-2006 04:31 PM |
| SGC 1887 N28 Allen & Ginter Baseball and more | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-15-2005 04:18 PM |
Threaded Mode