 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21
03-16-2010, 10:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I agree that some cards got trimmed just to 'fit' into a tobacco card stack, or into sleeves or holders. But I am satisfied that there are fewer Walsh's, and Sweeney's out there, than a bunch of the other E90-1s. And if accepting one that is trimmed is ok, that still doesn't drop the card down to 'common' in terms of availability. So if your point was that condition did not matter, then more all of the Mitchells out there would be acceptable, instead of only settling for a slabbed 9 of Mitchell for the Northern Hemisphere's Toughest Want List, for example.
Still. Mitchell is tough. Sweeney and Graham are tough. Notwithstanding condition. Last edited by Matt; 03-21-2010 at 11:41 AM. Reason: Reverted 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Question for the T210 Experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-05-2008 12:21 AM |
| question for mvsnyc and other T206 experts on southern league | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-25-2008 07:31 PM |
| question for M116 experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-27-2007 06:23 AM |
| QUESTION FOR ALL YOU EBAY EXPERTS | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-05-2004 11:15 PM |
| SCD Question for Mr. Lemke or other experts... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-13-2002 04:46 PM |
Threaded Mode