 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
11-07-2009, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Jason- it's not off topic, but as you mentioned there are other considerations in the decision. Sometimes a book gets so large, with all the annual additions of card sets, that it becomes too big to bind. That happened with Leonard Maltin's movie guide. Every year he had to add another 30 pages or so to the book (which lists nearly every movie ever made). It reached the point where the book was too big to bind, so it was divided into classic movies and more current ones. Perhaps the Standard catalog has to deal with similar issues, as that book was starting to get really large.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2010 Standard Catalog Thankyou Bob And Don | batsballsbases | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-04-2009 06:22 PM |
| Looking for help for 2010 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-08-2009 07:56 PM |
| Using the 2007 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-17-2007 04:58 PM |
| Experts sought for 2008 SCD Standard Catalog Team/Let the flames begin! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 10-11-2006 09:31 PM |
| Problems with Standard Catalog Old Judge section | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-01-2002 07:03 AM |
Threaded Mode