"As is evident in these posts, there is nothing but meaningful exchanges of information regarding T206 cards
conveyed in these exchanges between Matt and I."
Yep. Civil discourse. Oh. You left out post #47 where you told Matt how wrong he was, how his thinking was blurred, and implied that he needed reading lessons.
"So, all this conjured up crap by the likes of Jim VB, that started in his #48 post here, is imagined sheer B##S.
Simply, intended to instigate disruption in an otherwise very interesting and informative thread."
The thread got nasty at #47, not #48. I just got tired of the bully and called him on it in #48.
"This is just the latest in a continuing game Rob D and Jim VB have played in recent years on selected threads
on Net54. "
Again, I don't think I do what you claim. This is the very reason, I usually avoid commenting in your threads. I've probably made 500+ posts on this new board. Very few are confrontational. And fewer still are directed toward you. Until this thread, I can't remember the last time we (you and I) had any discussion. The only threads I have regularly disrupted have been Bruce's. That one's personal. He sent me emails wishing for my death.
If you don't like me, Ted, that's fine. I'll get over it. But in the mean time, please stop lying about me.
Anxiously awaiting your retraction and/or apology. In the meantime, I'm going to bed.
|
10-01-2009, 09:20 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode