 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
09-24-2009, 07:06 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I really don't have any use for commons unless I'm putting together a set of some kind. At one time I had a T206 and a 1952 Topps Reds team set so I needed the commons, but otherwise I normally just stick to HOF singles. It also depends on what you define as a common. In my 1952 Topps set there were guys like Wally Post, Roy McMillan, Joe Nuxhall, and Ted Kluszewski which could technically be called "commons", but to a Reds fan they were significant players.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Boxing - Vintage Boxing Photos and Other Memorabilia Ending Tonight August 9, on Ebay | D. Bergin | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 08-09-2009 03:54 PM |
| Vintage movie cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-14-2005 11:05 AM |
| Beckett eliminating subgrades for Vintage (BVG) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-11-2005 12:34 PM |
| What is the most valuable vintage sportscard collection worth | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 101 | 09-02-2005 06:57 AM |
| OT - Nationals worth it for vintage non-baseball cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-17-2005 01:42 AM |
Threaded Mode