![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Frank - thanks for weighing in. I agree that overbacking would not be as easy as just printing the cards with the correct back in the first place, but by that logic, we wouldn't have overprints, either. Although, to be fair, adding an additional back is even more intensive then overprinting a factory. Furthermore, Piedmont were the most common backs - it would be odd that they had Old Mills lying around and needed to turn one into a Piedmont. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Piedmont factory 42 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-04-2009 11:51 AM |
Piedmont Ad Piece | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-10-2007 09:49 PM |
Piedmont Fac. 42 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 10-27-2006 04:28 PM |
Piedmont Red? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-21-2003 10:15 PM |
Piedmont 42 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-09-2002 05:56 PM |