![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: joe brennan
To answer the questions about the card that had paper removed. The difference you are seeing in the corners or edges are because the build up of paper left gaps when I scanned the card. In other words, the corners were farther from the surface of the scanner and when the paper was removed it now lays dowmn flat on the scanner. As you can see by my Evers pic, my scanner sucks but its good enough for me since I am not a frequent seller of cards. I pressed the card between books to remove water and if it layed down some fiber, than it layed down some fiber. I still see nothing wrong with taking paper or glue off the back. Joe |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soaking question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-27-2007 08:26 PM |
Informal Poll- Soaking and erasing of cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 90 | 08-31-2006 11:27 PM |
Soaking a card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 119 | 08-30-2006 09:09 PM |
Soaking question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2006 10:24 AM |
Soaking stamps | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-23-2005 11:39 AM |