 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
07-01-2008, 10:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Let's continue the T213-1 debate....are they really T206's ?
Posted By: leon
Ya'll keep making up your own rules and see how far it goes....Burdick classified these correctly. I am all for doing a whole different catalog....but it won't be the ACC....So far NOT ONE PERSON has been able to confute the fact these were classified by mfg and, as such, done correctly. I rest my case..... 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E94s continue to get strong prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 05-11-2007 12:53 PM |
| T205 Wheat -eBay follies continue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-29-2007 05:30 AM |
| Let the debate continue--Greatest Season Performance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 07-08-2005 05:04 AM |
| Goodwins - Let the debate continue (but don't digress this time!) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-21-2004 12:13 PM |
| A Great Debate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-22-2002 11:15 PM |
Threaded Mode