 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
02-16-2008, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Grading question, all opinions welcome.
Posted By: Glyn Parson
Dan I am sorry you were not happy with our decision to not holder your 1931 sun picture photos. It is company policy at this time that we do not holder any of the do-it-yourself photo prints, The photos are only a portion of the item which in its entirety includes the negative, the photo paper, the envelope, and the stand, too much for our holder to contain. Also there is the fact that most can be easily reproduced using vintage photo paper. Rinky Dink Stamps are a recognized issue unlike the magazine pages you are comparing them to and we have chosen to holder this issue but only give it an Authentic grade. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC grading submission.....opinions? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 07-18-2008 08:13 AM |
| Grading opinions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-01-2006 07:29 AM |
| Opinions on Professional Grading Services | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-08-2006 09:54 PM |
| Opinions on sending cards in for Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-09-2004 03:28 PM |
| Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |
Threaded Mode