 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
02-05-2008, 09:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Most enjoyable low-grade set building experience?
Posted By: nbrazil
try collecting sets that have stain, paperloss and/or pin hole problems. Usually, these cards end up getting a low technical grade, but have great eye appeal. So, you end up paying PSA 1-3 prices on a card that would grade much higher based solely on eye appeal. 1915 CJs are notorious for stains bringing down grades..but, the overall quality of the card is high. Same with T3s for pinholes and paperloss and stains with some caramel issues (e98s) and tobbaco issues (t206s). 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Grade Hoblitzell Needed to Finish Set | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 10-28-2008 07:33 PM |
| What's your set-building strategy? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 08-15-2008 02:48 PM |
| Building a Low Grade T206 Collection | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-08-2008 01:40 PM |
| 1952 TOPPS MASTER NEAR SET LOW GRADE | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-30-2007 01:36 PM |
| Set building experiences | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-26-2003 06:49 PM |
Threaded Mode