 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
11-13-2007, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
E98 power ranking according to SGC
Posted By: JimB
Miner Brown is one and the same with Mordacai Brown. It is the same pose as you find for his E93 card. I consider him to be a mid-tier HOF compared with some others in that era. He definately should command a higher ranking than a common. I am sure it was just an oversight by SGC. It is a huge task to rank every card in every set. Those who actively collect the set will always have different opinions. For example, the Clarke card is a tough HOF, but rarely acknowledged as such IMHO. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help Ranking M101 4/5 backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-11-2009 06:23 AM |
| T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
| OT : College Football Ranking-- Just an Observation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 01-11-2009 05:53 AM |
| T206's...the harder to get cards ranking? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-10-2007 11:19 AM |
| Ranking Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-08-2006 09:22 AM |
Threaded Mode