 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
07-13-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Legal issues in the hobby
Posted By: P Spaeth
The PSA question could be a good law school exam question. Is the act of grading a card an ongoing representation or warranty, such that there would be no statute of limitations issue vis a vis a new buyer even though the Wagner was graded 16 years ago? Does PSA owe a duty of care for purposes of a possible negligence claim to the world or only to the person submitting the card? With all the rumor and innuendo out there, does any buyer assume the risk it is trimmed? Or in the same vein, is any reliance on PSA unreasonable? Suppose PSA has only a limited warranty (they will only pay up to X dollars on an overgraded or shouldn't have been graded at all card). Is the limitation effective? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1975 trader speaks hobby mag 12 issues | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 05-24-2008 05:29 PM |
| NYC Conference to Discuss Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 01-12-2007 04:51 AM |
| Memory Lane's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-06-2007 08:11 PM |
| Andy Madec Sportscards Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2006 08:58 PM |
| Clean Sweep's Stance on Larger Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-29-2006 10:56 AM |
Threaded Mode