![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
Mile High claims or at least strongly implies it has just found out the extent of the restoration in the last several days. It appears as if Mile High may have had the card since late September or early OCtober--certainly communications about the alteration were exchanged back then. Back then Mile High makes it appear that they wanted to minimize mention of restoration, which appears to be against consignor Roger's wishes. When Roger sees their description, he wants his items pulled. They are not, and now, Mile High tries to portray itself as being stonewalled in its efforts to get answers from its consignor. I would say Roger has many reasons to be mad. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Four Base Hits Kelly and Website | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-23-2008 01:09 PM |
O/T Four Base Hits | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 01-02-2008 07:34 PM |
Help with a value for 1890 base-ball book by John Ward | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 09-10-2007 02:52 PM |
Four Base Hits Scans | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-07-2006 09:08 AM |
Four Base Hits | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-29-2004 09:57 PM |