Mastronet, I may be wrong here but let's here opinions??

[Archive]

Posted By: dan mckee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan [bandache@comcast.net]
> Sent: Mon 2/19/2007 6:30 PM
> To: Peter Calderon
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Lot #960
>
>
>
> ok thanks Pete
> Why isn't paperloss and writing on back mentioned in the auction lots?
> That is a very significant condition distraction to any card.
> Do you agree?
>
> dan
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Calderon" <pcalderon@mastroauctions.com>
> To: "Dan" <bandache@comcast.net>
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:22 PM
> Subject: RE: Lot #960
>
>
> > The loss on Adams is in the lower left corner. It's right at the corner
> > and triangle shaped... make a 3/16" square box and cut it in half
> > diagonally to get an idea on the size.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan [bandache@comcast.net]
> > Sent: Mon 2/19/2007 4:42 PM
> > To: Peter Calderon
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: Lot #960
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks Pete
> > How bad is Adams?
> > Just a pin head or significant?
> > He is 1 of my upgrades
> >
> > thanks
> > dan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Calderon" <pcalderon@mastroauctions.com>
> > To: <bandache@comcast.net>
> > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:55 AM
> > Subject: Lot #960
> >
> >
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > A few cards have little spots of paper loss: Adams, Cicotte, Engle,
> > > Walker
> > > and Wingo.
> > >
> > > Peter

EDITED TO SURPRESS MY IRISH TEMPER. YES MY BUTTONS GOT PUSHED BY THE RESPONSE BUT MY ANGER IS AT THE AUCTION HOUSE RULES, NOT PETE OR DOUG OR ANY ONE PERSON. Dan.

EDITED ONCE AGAIN ON THE REQUEST OF A GOOD FRIEND THAT CHEWED MY ASS.

I KNOW THIS IS GOING TO BE HARD TO BELIEVE BUT SOMEONE MAY ACTUALLY MISS ME 1 DAY!