 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
08-31-2006, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
ACC designations
Posted By: leon
IMHO, the ACC is sacred and should not be changed in any way.....again, I am sure there are different views but I view it as sacred to collecting...We all know the mistakes made but they are what they are....I would vote only to categorize the baseball cards that aren't in there....there has to be a few hundred....and maybe it would be entitled with a "Baseball" in the name of it so it wouldnt be confused with the whole ACC being updated....No way would I want to do that....but bless our collecting grandfathers for doing it.... 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACC modification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-10-2007 12:15 AM |
| Need help on designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-31-2006 01:03 PM |
| Question re: "ACC Designations" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-12-2005 08:49 AM |
| T206 Willis Overprint w/Two Factory Designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2005 12:00 PM |
| What do the Factory designations on T cards actually mean? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-24-2003 10:09 PM |
Threaded Mode