 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
06-04-2006, 09:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a reprint - looks too good to be true....
Posted By: Steve M.
do you presume that the bidders were sight impaired and that's why they couldn't see the qualifier? Other than the fact that the lister omitted mentioning it everything else you have to say is right on. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Too good to be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-16-2006 02:52 PM |
| W514 Jackson - 2 good 2 be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-16-2005 11:57 AM |
| To good to be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2005 09:37 AM |
| OJ reprint that is almost too good to be true | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-30-2003 02:32 PM |
| Too Good To Be True? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-16-2002 09:11 AM |
Threaded Mode