![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
This is a joke right - who in their right mind would get so worked up about this. People buy cards all the time with the goal of flipping them for a quick profit. Granted, most buy raw cards or graded cards that appear undergraded and resubmit them. If they get a higher grade and dont reveal that it was once in a lower holder is that dishonest - I dont think so. Sellers who crack out of slabs and sell hoping that they will get more money are taking a chance IMO - but frankly if you buy a raw card relying on a seller's claim that its mint without examining the scan closely, you deserve whatever you get. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scientific Batting Practice Arcade Game | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 11-27-2008 10:58 AM |
Better Bidding Practice on Huggins & Scott Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 10-20-2007 08:42 AM |
would it be unethical.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-29-2005 10:03 AM |
Probably an old topic - The Unethical role of graders | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-28-2005 12:01 PM |
DAN~Practice session*FIND the UNtrimmed card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-23-2002 06:20 AM |