![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PASJD
Hal c'mon that "slippery slope" argument is not terribly persuasive and you know it. Obviously there is a difference between keeping a Leaf Musial which you like and which most people would call his rookie card and the anarchy of having no focus at all. Keep the card, the 48B is (in my humble opinion) an uninteresting card even if a hypertechnical, Talmudic analysis says it is his rookie card and the Leaf isn't. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948 Leaf vs. 1949 Leaf? | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 3 | 03-31-2009 04:54 AM |
1948 Leaf, etc. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-30-2007 08:15 PM |
Tell me about 1948/49 Leaf | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 03-13-2007 12:36 PM |
SOT 1948 Leaf boxing Cards Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-18-2007 10:57 AM |
1948 Leaf | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-17-2003 09:09 AM |