 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
03-26-2005, 08:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
1948 Leaf question
Posted By: PASJD
Hal that makes sense as it would have seemed uneconomical to have to make up a new printing plate to print the same card with a different back. I think it is safe to assume that a card with a 1949 copyright was probably printed in 1949. What seems to be unclear is whether the cards with the 1948 copyright were issued in late 1948 or in 1949. Is your ultimate question here whether you need to buy a Leaf Paige to have his true RC? EDITED TO ADD: I just checked the SMR and for what little it is worth, they don't designate the 49B Paige as a rookie. I wonder if Beckett does. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1948 Leaf vs. 1949 Leaf? | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 3 | 03-31-2009 04:54 AM |
| 1948 Leaf, etc. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-30-2007 08:15 PM |
| Tell me about 1948/49 Leaf | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 03-13-2007 12:36 PM |
| SOT 1948 Leaf boxing Cards Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-18-2007 10:57 AM |
| 1948 Leaf | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-17-2003 09:09 AM |
Threaded Mode