![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I agree that the paper loss will hurt the grade. It is also a bit miscut/off centered (notice the name on the bottom has been cut through the bottom. Otherwise its a very nice looking card. If not for those two problems (and I cant tell if there are wrinkles or anything else) I would have guessed the card would get a 6. With the paper loss, no better than a 3 probably. I would still get it graded if you like the looks of a graded card. Here's a card of mine that SGC graded - this thing looks absolutely gorgeous - even better corners that that T206 of yours yet it got graded a 40 (3) by SGC. What's wrong with it? An almost unnoticable wrinkle along the bottom of the back side. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question of condition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-19-2008 05:42 PM |
T206 raw/off condition wanted | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 06-01-2008 03:49 PM |
T206 Speaker in fair condition ... value ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-25-2008 03:48 PM |
Looking for HOF t206 any condition | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-25-2005 06:43 AM |
Grading/condition question??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-15-2004 12:39 PM |