![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd (nolemmings)
PSA takes the time to research or otherwise knows that there are two variations of this card, one with correct spelling and one without. Then they can't get it right? How hard is it to look at the name on the flip and compare it to the card within the slab? You don't even have to know how to spell his name to see that the two don't match. I have no problem with Dan pointing out such buffoonery wherever/whenever it is found. It seems Cochrane is the Irish word for Hermanski. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 DELONG #6 MICKEY COCHRANE PSA 8 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-08-2008 07:51 AM |
Am I reading the quote from the PSA grader correctly in this article? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 01-26-2008 11:47 AM |
Buttercream Cochrane | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-04-2007 10:10 AM |
cards measure correctly but come back trimmed. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-06-2005 09:54 PM |
TOUCHE! PSA and a correctly labeled 1948 Hermanski | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-06-2004 05:24 PM |