![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
The reason for card #106 missing is that Goudey printed two of the #144 Ruth cards, as Ruth was clearly the headliner of the 1933 set. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lionel Carter's 33 goudey # 106 Lajoie...Story | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-22-2007 09:45 PM |
1933 lajoie on ebay....i can't resist | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-25-2006 09:50 PM |
1933 Lajoie good or bad | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-12-2006 11:26 AM |
1933 Nap Lajoie #106 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-08-2003 06:14 PM |
Is this the same 1933 Goudey Lajoie as Leland's had? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-29-2003 08:05 PM |