![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Andy Baran
Also, the 1916 set is not a continuation of the 1915 set. There are many players that exist in both sets, but there number is different depending on the issue. Both sets were numbered alphbetically, based on the players in the set. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sporting News Supplement question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-16-2008 07:21 AM |
1917 M101-4 The Sporting News question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-02-2005 04:14 PM |
Sporting News Back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-13-2004 09:47 AM |
Question regarding M101-5 'The Sporting News' | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-22-2002 09:33 AM |
George Cutshaw/ Sporting News Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-08-2002 10:26 AM |