 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-13-2025, 12:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Set collectors - flaws you are ok with
The last set I completed was 1975 Topps baseball. It was about five years ago and I drove myself crazy ensuring that I had no cards with print dots/fish eyes. I have taken a break from set building, but I’m about to start back. I will primarily focus on the 70s sets. I don’t know if I can be as picky this time around because so many of the 70s cards have these types of print imperfections. For you fellow set collectors, what types of print flaws are you OK having in your sets. I draw the line with imperfections that were not part of the production process (writing, creases, etc.). Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Happy Collecting Ed 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Print Flaws... It's Not Just About the $$$ | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-30-2023 08:36 AM |
| 1968 Topps printing flaws question? | George Baseball | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-01-2021 06:16 PM |
| 70’s Set Collectors, which “flaws” are acceptable/unacceptable to you? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 04-02-2019 08:05 PM |
| What card flaws are acceptable for your PC? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 11-25-2013 06:02 PM |
| What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 04-23-2008 07:58 PM |
Threaded Mode