 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
04-26-2025, 05:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
PSA would grade it if it's an authorized reprint. You could try to put a sticky note or explanation to return Ungraded if it's a reprint, but it would be up to them. And then, a small preventative of the time, the will not notice and grade it as the original card.
You've got to trust that they can still detect a real original card, and they've proven on some occasions incapable of accomplishing that. Add: i will say, you should easily be able to tell the difference between those sets, because the original 1953 is a larger size than a Topps reprint which measures 2.5x3.5.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 04-26-2025 at 05:55 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Grading Question - help! | oucats02 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 12-13-2017 11:48 AM |
| SGC Grading Question | magic1313 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 04-01-2010 07:12 AM |
| Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-04-2007 01:46 PM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
| sgc grading question for y'all | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-16-2005 04:32 PM |
Threaded Mode